Only rarely do these studies account for other possible causes of diminished psychological wellbeing.
For instance, a test subject might be depressed because he or she just lost a great job, not because he or she is having casual sex and feels badly about that.
Having dissatisfied clients is bad for her business. I would have loved for this article to have gone full circle. B) Females grow tired of their spouses sooner then males grow tired of their spouses.
She will want to ensure that her patrons are happy with her services and will want to return another time. If it isn't clear to a reader, there is no hope for such a one. Two major advancements have come to pass over the recent 36 months in the field of sexology. Thus disproving the notion that females are naturally inclined for monogamy. ( 99.99% of people take the point of view that women are naturally fitted for monogamy more then men, which we now know is dead wrong!
- With broad brush statements like (A) & (B)^, who needs citations...
They seem to feel that sexual activity without emotional connection and long-term commitment (such as marriage) is an E-Ticket to eternal damnation, depression, or low self-esteem.A) Human females want short term, commitment free sex just as much, or perhaps more then, males. ) The article does not mention these two earthshaking lessons.I would have killed to of seen these major advancements at least mentioned!In a previous post, I wrote about Ashley Madison, a website and app designed to help married people engage in sexual infidelity.I got the same basic response that I get whenever I speak or write about that site, or about sexual infidelity in general: Many are appalled that infidelity is so prevalent and that it has been so thoroughly monetized, while others simply shrug their shoulders and say, “People have been cheating since the beginning of time. ” When I speak and write about casual sex among single people, I get a similar reaction.Except for one thing: More males than females reported that they’d recently engaged in casual sex (double the number in the first study, and more than double in the second).One rather simple explanation, other than that some of the test subjects might be fibbing, is that women define “casual sex” differently than men—primarily because they are more likely to seek and feel an emotional connection in addition to the physical experience. Research on the psychological effects of casual sexual encounters is in its infancy, and scientists are just beginning to scratch the surface.That said, you may face related issues like STDs, unwanted pregnancy, partners who see your relationship as more than just casual, etc.And you should understand that these related factors could adversely affect your psychological wellbeing even if the sex itself does not.For some people, it is probably fine, and for others it is probably not.Each person is an individual, with a unique life history and emotional makeup, so each person is likely to respond differently to casual sexual behavior.