So Christian matchmakers, cake makers, photographers, florists, gift shop and venue owners, pizzerias, bed and breakfast owners, bakers, pizza shop owners, carpenters, and other Christian-run businesses and organizations have been targeted, harassed, retaliated against via prosecution (which in many cases has forced closure) and/or legally required to engage in activities that contradict their religious faith for the sake of legitimizing homosexual behavior through a secular and sexualized agenda.This cultural and judicial coercion isn’t simply relegated to Christian family business owners.Cast the first stone who never met someone through a dating app or website.A decade ago, it was a taboo to reveal the truth, when friends, acquaintances – or mum and dad – asked you where you met your new boyfriend for the first time.With a large & growing gay dating membership, you can start step one by simply contacting us today We only take on gay people that are out and looking to meet someone special so if you choose to join Intro, you will be in good company and stand an excellent chance of making a lasting connection with a like-minded partner Our team of professional matchmkaers are here to answer your calls and emails.Whatever queries you may have, rest assured, we have years of experience matching straight and gay couples across Ireland and would be delighted to explain our process further to you. The latest example of the erosion of religious liberty comes as a judge recently ruled that the owners of Christian online dating service Christian Mingle.com, Spark Networks Inc., must begin including gay persons as part of their dating pool to pursue same-sex relationships.Because the dating website didn’t allow new users to specify their search to include a seeker status for gays looking for same-sex relationships, two gay men decided to sue the site’s owner claiming the limited, heterosexual options violated the Unruh Civil Rights Act – a California anti-discrimination law that requires businesses to provide, “full and equal accommodations” to people regardless of their sexual orientation.” As a result, not only will Christian be forced to include and accommodate homosexuals as part of their dating service, Catholic and Adventist Singles Connection.com, two other Christian-oriented dating sites must also include gays in their relationship-seeking pool of dating hopefuls.
More so, they’re also being forced to participate in and/or contribute to those things that infringe upon their religious and theological beliefs. George recently said, religious freedom continues to be under assault by the new court-enforced establishment religion of a revolutionary, sexualized ideology.They didn’t want their “love” to be merely recognized or else they wouldn’t have intentionally politicized it.No, the sexual totalitarians demanded that homosexual behavior, relationships and “marriage” be publicly celebrated and affirmed, regardless of the religious beliefs and commitments that morally informed those who disagreed.Court-enforced coercion and social marginalization of Christians is not going away. More Christian businesses will be sued, fined, undermined and closed in the pursuit of stamping out all forms of religious defiance.And if Christians continue to stay quiet and refuse to fight back while this kind of sexual and judicial despotism gains wider influence, they become complicit in their religious liberty being taken away.Even though the traditional gay cruising is still a thing in the German capital. Its 3 million users spend an average of 54 minutes a day connected!Operating with the GPS of your phone or tablet, it helps you find all types of guys nearby.In actuality, it’s the gender and sexual revolutionaries who are hell-bent on forcing their distorted view of (homo)sexuality onto people who differ with them through the passage of so-called anti-discrimination legislation and through the tyrannical use of the judiciary.This is why the issue of religious liberty combined with a faith-filled public and political witness by Christians is so important.It wasn’t too long ago when so-called gay rights advocates began their social and political campaign to normalize homosexuality, they claimed that publicly accepting gay relationships and civil unions – a deliberate and calculated step toward the eventual redefinition of marriage – wouldn’t injure society or interfere with other people’s lives or relationships.They morally emotionalized their message as being one of “love” against “hate.” They recast their social experiment and crusade against traditional sexual norms and cultural values as one in pursuit of “justice” and civil “rights.” They simply wanted, they claimed, to be treated “equally” like everyone else.